Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dub FX (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Yash t 101 11:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dub FX[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was resored at request after an the last AfD closed as no quorum, and was soft deleted. I do believe the original rationale stands, so this could be seen as a relisting of the original debate. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Plenty of coverage showing up on Google News from several different countries, e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. --Michig (talk) 12:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. And some more Google News sources: MusicRadar [11], Russia Today [12], România Liberă [13], Polskie Radio [14], fr:Maville.com [15], de:Derwesten.de [16]. Passes WP:BAND #1 and WP:GNG easily. And he's plastered all over the blogosphere, and has 4 million listens per Last.fm and 50 million+ views on Youtube--this video alone has 13 million plus views and 100,000 ratings and 20,000 comments. Especially for an independent artist, this suggests a notable audience. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 02:57, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Clear Keep per provided sources. Cavarrone (talk) 22:06, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep per Michig and Hobbes Goodyear above. Obviously passes WP:MUSIC 1, and the sheer breadth and depth of coverage makes me confused as to how the previous AfD closed with a claim the GNG hadn't been met. ✤ Fosse 8 ✤ ^talk 15:43, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.